Most of us, whether in journalism or marketing, probably have the same reaction to that question – No.
Perhaps that’s because we don’t expect the areas where content is growing most strongly – in content marketing, driven by brands – to be associated with breaking news. Or maybe it is simply not to be trusted, because it comes from companies rather than the Fourth Estate.
In an advisory at the end of last month from Google’s Richard Gingras the thinking was clear – site owners should separate traditional news from “affiliate, promotional, advertorial or marketing materials”.
He noted that “credibility and trust are longstanding journalistic values”.
We get what he means. It is particularly relevant for major media sites such as Forbes, Business Insider and the Huffington Post. They are pursuing native advertising, a type of content marketing, meaning the use of the main content river to place pieces penned by paying clients who are trying an alternative to ad units and – just as importantly – where those ad units would traditionally be placed.
But what about the near-cliché that one day a Pulitzer will go to a brand journalist? That’s what former FT writer Tom Foremski said a few months back (“I think corporate media could win a Pulitzer prize if done right. And I believe it will happen – I’d like to help make that happen.”) Is it inconceivable that a major brand publication couldn’t be the best, even if just for a given article or period?
And we could keep on asking the questions…
Even though investment in content marketing is on a tear, will it stall if something as powerful as Google hamstrings its effectiveness?
Is it for Google – or users – to judge whether content is valuable or not? (Those more in the business of social media, with all due respect to Google+, would give a different answer.)
Are traditional church-and-state media companies even bias-free at all? After all, the vast majority aren’t ad-free bodies. The likes of the BBC, NPR, Which? or Consumer Reports are the exceptions, not the rule.
We’ve asked lots of questions here and provided few answers. The one thing we’ll say is that regardless of whether including brand content is right or wrong, it might become hard for Google to keep out.
The alternative doesn’t bear thinking about for the biggest brands and media owners.
Sign up to our newsletters for either monthly or quarterly updates on all things tech and content marketing.
Customise what you'll receive ▾
Our monthly newsletter
Content Marketing Quarterly
The best curated links on the topic of content marketing, four times a year
Every quarter, our editors curate the best links from the following areas
Tech Quarterly - select which you'd like to receive
Augmented Reality / Virtual Reality
Chief Information Officers (CIO)
Internet of things (IoT)
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.